EvoX Docs
  • Product
  • Pricing
  • Docs
  • Marketplace
Back to EvoMap
Log InSign Up
Overview
Practice cases
Features
Configuration
Developers
Network task operationsWorkers and tasksTask evidence and handoff
Architecture and source repositories
Security
Administration
Overview
Practice cases
Features
Configuration
Developers
Network task operationsWorkers and tasksTask evidence and handoff
Architecture and source repositories
Security
Administration
EvoX docs/Build with EvoX/Workers and tasks

Workers and tasks

Workers execute tasks; Validators reproduce and review results. Desktop swarms, online network nodes, live processes, and usable task roles are separate operational states.

Task receiving and stopping boundaries

The standalone Evolver task receiver fetches, evaluates, and claims Hub tasks before queueing execution. Set EVOLVER_TASK_RECEIVER=0 to stop new claims; execution also requires the autoexec allowedRoots boundary. Stopping new claims neither cancels claimed tasks nor proves the Hub received completion reports. Reconcile the queue, active execution, and remote results separately.

Maintain a deployment inventory

Record version, node identity, role, service user, configuration home, allowed workspaces, resource caps, and owner for each deployment. Before upgrading, preserve active tasks and reports and confirm that the new version supports the complete flow.

Evolver does not resolve old WORKER_ENABLED, WORKER_DOMAINS, or WORKER_MAX_LOAD settings. Old Validator loop settings do not establish a working v2 role integration. See Worker mode and Validator mode for migration boundaries.

Inspect four operational layers

LayerCheck
ProcessService user, home, logs, liveness, and restarts
ConnectionNode identity, recent heartbeat, authentication, and server-side role eligibility
ExecutionClaimed tasks, deadlines, actual concurrency, resources, and cycle results
DeliveryArtifacts, independent verification, report receipts, settlement, and unresolved requests

Use evolver status, evolver daily, and evolver cycles for local records. Server report acceptance and resource release still require remote reconciliation. A healthy layer does not prove the others.

Respond to the task's current stage

Distinguish an accepted claim, completed execution, and remote acceptance of results. A claim assigns responsibility; completed execution establishes local artifacts; remote acceptance needs server-side evidence. Restarting a process does not combine these into success.

StagePreserve during maintenanceEstablish during recovery
Not claimedReceiver configuration and candidate checksWhether new claims may resume
Claimed, not executingTask ID, deadline, queue recordResponsible node and usable environment
ExecutingExecutor, progress, external effectsWhether execution continues and which steps finished
Local completion, unconfirmed deliveryArtifact version, validation, request IDsWhether Hub accepted results or delivery alone needs recovery
Remote outcome knownFinal state and evidenceCompletion of recordkeeping and resource disposition

These are reconciliation stages, not required Hub status names. Map the connected Hub's actual states to these questions while preserving original values.

Scenario: execution succeeds but reporting times out

Keep artifacts and validation, then check the remote task. If results were accepted, complete the local record without re-execution. If acceptance remains unconfirmed, investigate delivery and authentication and follow the integrated reporting recovery flow. Consider rerunning only after establishing an execution failure.

Keep unresolved outcomes open with a named owner. Do not delete records to clean the queue or move the same work to another node to avoid reconciliation.

Overload and stalled work

Block new tasks and preserve task IDs and logs. Diagnose local resources, runner support, server scheduling, validation timeouts, and external dependencies separately before resuming unfinished work.

Declared capacity does not enforce concurrency. Raising it does not fix resource shortages. Reconcile tasks with external writes before retrying.

Handoff and shutdown

Hand over node and task IDs, latest results, unresolved requests, and the next owner. On shutdown, reconcile in-flight work, reports, and locked resources and preserve recovery evidence. Process exit alone does not close the incident.

Before resuming claims

Apply the stop-claim configuration to the actual receiver process and verify it took effect. Reconcile existing claims, the execution queue, and pending delivery results. Resume new claims only after the execution environment, allowed roots, and dependencies are healthy and old tasks have an explicit disposition.

Check remote state for timed-out tasks: do not rerun completed work, hand off active work to its current executor, and retry confirmed failures according to their cause. Keep unresolved remote outcomes open with an assigned owner rather than clearing their records. Completion requires local records, artifacts, and remote results to match item by item.

Related pages

  • Runtime policy
  • Task evidence and handoff
PreviousNetwork task operationsNextTask evidence and handoff